Image Credit: underworld/123rf.com
In a significant advancement in organ transplantation, two innovative methods have been developed to enhance the viability of donor hearts, particularly addressing ethical concerns associated with current practices. These methods have been detailed in recently published studies in *The New England Journal of Medicine*.
Traditionally, donor hearts are sourced from individuals declared brain dead but maintained on life support to ensure their organs remain oxygenated. An alternative practice, known as donation after circulatory death (DCD), involves retrieving hearts from donors who have died following a circulatory arrest. However, this method poses risks as the lack of circulation can lead to irreversible damage to the heart.
One common strategy for preserving these vulnerable hearts involves connecting the organ to a perfusion machine that pumps warm, oxygenated blood. While effective, this method is costly and labor-intensive. Another approach, normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), circulates blood through the donor’s body after the heart has stopped, allowing physicians to assess heart function directly. Despite its advantages, NRP has faced ethical scrutiny, with some arguing that it conflicts with the definition of death.
To address these ethical dilemmas, researchers have introduced new techniques. A team at Duke University has developed a method to reanimate infant hearts externally using a simplified perfusion circuit. This approach allows oxygenated blood to flow into the heart through a catheter, enabling surgeons to observe its function without ethical concerns tied to direct blood flow to the brain. Early results from this technique indicate it could potentially increase the pediatric donor pool by up to 20 percent.
Meanwhile, at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, a different method called recovery with extended ultraoxygenated preservation (REUP) has been tested. This technique involves injecting a cold, oxygen-rich solution into the aorta shortly after circulatory death to revive the heart’s tissues without restarting its beating function. Initial results show that this method has successfully preserved hearts for three adult transplants, with recipients demonstrating strong recovery and no signs of organ rejection six months post-surgery.
Both innovations carry implications for the future of heart transplantation, particularly concerning ethical considerations and the ability to maximize donor organ use. While REUP challenges the conventional practice of restarting the heart for assessment, it does introduce some risks, such as not directly observing the heart’s performance before transplantation. Nevertheless, the developments represent a promising step forward in the field of organ transplantation, with the potential to save more lives and improve outcomes for patients in need of heart transplants.
Check out the original article here: Source link
